Obama Would Handle Coronavirus Pandemic Better Than Trump


A new poll discovered that a majority of voters would prefer President Barack Obama to run the nation during the coronavirus pandemic than current President Trump. However, Americans remain deeply divided over their chosen leadership amidst the outbreak that has spread to more than 400,000 across the country.

According to Politico, 52% of Americans think that Obama would do a better job in the current crisis. Only 38% think that Trump would handle it better in a sample of 1,990 voters. When presented with a choice between Trump and Bide, 44% picked the current president, a sign that doesn’t bode well for the Democratic nominee.


Obama has largely left the public attention since he departed from the Whitehouse but has become more active on social media since the outbreak. He endorsed Senator Elisabeth Warren’s plan for fighting the pandemic and also criticized Trump’s approach, something he rarely does.

Trump has been the target of critics for his slow reaction to the outbreak, something he denies doing. He also had a phone conversation with Biden regarding the handling of the crisis. “I laid out what I thought he should be doing,” Biden commented on the call Tuesday on CNN. “I laid out four or five specific points that I thought were necessary. I indicated that it is about taking responsibility, and being the commander in chief, taking on the responsibility.”


Trump claimed that he had a “wonderful, warm conversation” with Biden.

“It was a very nice conversation,” he added. “He gave me his point of view and I fully understood that.”

Not everyone agrees that Trump is handling the outbreak correctly. The Washington Post recently published a scathing article on the White House’s reaction. “From the Oval Office to the CDC, political and institutional failures cascaded through the system and opportunities to mitigate the pandemic were lost,” the article states.

What do Trump, Putin and Merkel Eat?


Vladimir Putin has a fantastic shape considering he is 67 years old. Because of that, the public has always wondered what he eats in a day.


For breakfast, the president eats porridge, tvorog (cottage cheese) with honey, and he also drinks raw quail eggs. Putin likes to drink a cocktail of beetroot and horseradish juice as well.

A few years later, the Russian leader revealed he enjoys rice and buckwheat, but not oatmeal.

Read also: Vladimir Putin was Proposed by Julia

“I don’t have much time for food,” he said. “I like vegetables: Tomatoes, cucumbers, salad. In the morning – porridge, cottage cheese, honey. If there’s a choice between meat and fish – I prefer fish, I also like a lamb,” he added.

Vladimir travels a lot, so he often has to eat in the move.

“When I go somewhere, I’m pleased to try the local cuisine. I’m accustomed to green tea. I usually don’t have dinner, since I don’t have time. In the afternoon, I try to eat fruit, to drink kefir when it’s available – and when it’s not, I prefer not to eat anything at all,” Putin says.

A few years ago, St. Petersburg restaurant Podvorye had a special menu – “The Lunch of Vladimir Putin,” – which offered the his favorite dishes.

The chef Anatoly Galkin said that Putin prefers wine or beer when it comes to drinks. The cook shared a recipe for a unique cocktail, drunk by guests at official receptions: Plenty of ice, a drop of lemon juice, mint, and 50 grams of champagne.

Some media outlets also say the president enjoys Spanish red wines.

The diet of Donald Trump has been the subject of much debate.


Trump’s not big on the first meal of the day. He said that he often avoids breakfast. He has lunch, but his big thing is dinner.

When he eats breakfast in the morning, he has either bacon and eggs, cereal, or a McDonald’s McMuffin. He does not drink coffee or tea. Donald said: “My favorite would be bacon and eggs…bacon medium and the eggs over-well.”

The President reportedly isn’t a fan of eating much during the day. His eating habits are described in the book Let Trump Be Trump, written by Corey Lewandowski. He revealed, “the president would usually go 14 to 16 hours without eating”.

Also Read: President Trump Could Learn a Thing from these Movies

He enjoys the meatloaf, however. In 2005, he and Melania appeared on Martha Stewart, where they prepared a meatloaf sandwich, which is Trump’s favorite.

This is when Trump eats the most since he eats the rest of the day lightly. He’s a massive fan of fast food, such as McDonald’s, Burger King, and KFC – but not just because of the tastiness and reliability. He likes food from a safety perspective.


The German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, enjoys Italian food. She is definitely influenced by the Italian lifestyle. She considers dinner or lunch as a highlight of the day. Her favorite meal is “Spaghetti Bolognese. “Angela also enjoys Ravioli, and she chooses fruit as a dessert.

Vladimir Putin was Proposed by Julia

Russian President Vladimir Putin took advantage of Ivanovo’s visit to talk to residents for a while, and at one point, a woman who made love to him stood out from the crowd.

“Take me for a wife,” she told him.

The president smiled, saying it was a “nice proposal” and asked her name, to which she replied, “Julia.”

The girl then approached Putin and, as she later told, managed to give him her photo with phone number.

Also read: Pamela Anderson asked Vladimir Putin for help

“I gave him the photo, and now we will see what the answer will be,” said the confident girl from Ivanovo.

Later, in an interview with representatives of social organizations, Putin said that Ivanovo had always been called the city of brides, so he got an offer.

Julia admitted that she liked Putin a long time ago, but could not say what her chances were for marriage.

During his visit to Ivanovo, Putin also visited a children’s hospital and factory for the production of military and civilian parachutes.


Astana Club Annual Meeting and Introduction to Key Dangers in Euro-Asia 2020

The Astana Club held its fifth annual meeting on November 11-12, 2019. The discussion rounds were dedicated to the compelling issues of security and the strategic future of the Eurasian supercontinent in current emerging geopolitical and geo-economic realities. The meeting convened in Astana, Kazakhstan, featuring 50 renowned politicians, experts and diplomats.

The event is organized by the Institute of World Economics and Politics (IWEP) and the Foundation of the First President of the Republic of Kazakhstan – Elbasy.


Astana Club was established in 2015. It has become a global platform that united Eurasia’s key stakeholders in addressing the most critical and complex issues. Kazakhstan proves itself an independent and neutral platform for dialogue, open to every member of the international community, including mutual rivals and competitors. Astana Club is Kazakhstan’s vivid embodiment of multi-vector foreign policy and its mechanism for the development of the agenda in the Central Asia region.

The agenda includes the compelling issues of security and the strategic future of Greater Eurasia’s emerging geopolitical and geo-economic realities.

Key speakers of the 2019 event included:

  • José Manuel Barroso, President of the European Commission (2004-2014) and Prime Minister of Portugal (2002-2004);
  • Yun Byung-Se, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Korea (2013-2017);
  • Evan Feigenbaum, Vice President for Studies at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace;
  • Franco Frattini, Foreign Minister of Italy (2002-2004, 2008-2011) and Vice President of European Commission (2004-2008);
  • Dan Smith, Director of the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIRPI);
  • Astana Club united experts from the Afghanistan, Austria, Bangladesh, Belgium, China, Egypt, Great Britain, India, Iran, Italy, Japan, Kyrgyzstan, Norway, Pakistan, Portugal, Russia, Serbia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, and the USA.

International experts combined their efforts and expertise in drafting the report titled “Top 10 Risks for Eurasia 2020”. The discussions revolved around the main theme “Greater Eurasia: on the way to a new architecture of global cooperation”.

“Collaboration is not possible without honest, direct and transparent dialogue. Such dialogue results in new rules for cooperation based on current realities. In this light, discussions of the Astana Club are a dialogue about the most crucial subjects. It’s Kazakhstan’s input in the development of global cooperation,” said Dariga Nazarbaeva, Senator of the Republic of Kazakhstan.

The key dangers for Eurasia in 2020 notwithstanding:

1. Consequential convulsions of the 2020 US Presidential Political race

The present leader of the US, Donald Trump, has just propelled a battle for re-appointment for another term. Be that as it may, his adversaries undermine him with the indictment. Vulnerabilities in the political advancement of the world’s driving superpower can present genuine dangers for the entire of Eurasia.

2. Worldwide financial downturn

The trigger for another financial emergency with worldwide ramifications could be issued in rising economies. In the midst of the surge of capital, developing business sector monetary standards risk falling, which will worsen organizations’ obligation issues and winding the worldwide emergency.

3. Heightening of the US-China encounter


The danger of an expanded encounter between the US and China was noted on the primary line of a year ago’s appraising. The issue stays applicable in 2020. The contention among Washington and Beijing can come to fruition into an undeniable key showdown.

4. Another race of atomic rocket weapons

In 2019, we saw the breakdown of the Settlement on the Disposal of Middle of the road Range and Shorter-Range Rockets (INF), which at one time turned into an image of the procedure of release. In 2020, the world will be stood up to with the likelihood of an all-out invalidation of the “rules of the game” in the field of vital weapons.

5. Intensification of the fight for innovative strength

It very well may be normal that the geopolitical division of the innovative space will turn out to be increasingly evident. Cases with Chinese organizations Huawei and ZTE are a sort of “run-in” instrument for the regionalization of business sectors for IT-items.

6. Military acceleration of the contention around Iran

The initial move towards a much more noteworthy heightening of the encounter around Iran could be the end of the atomic understanding. Iran’s encounter with geopolitical opponents can spread broadly into the internet. The circumstance will continually hold prisoner the whole security framework in the Center East.

7. Atomic emergency on the Korean landmass

The development of North Korea towards a harmony arrangement and the standardization of relations with the US is at a moderate pace. The danger of an inability to arrange is exacerbated by developing contrasts between the gatherings. The complexity of the circumstance can likewise be brought about by the consequential convulsions of the US presidential political race in 2020.


8. Another influx of fear-mongering

In spite of the thrashing of Daesh, fear monger bunches are encountering another stage in their improvement, growing the topography of activity. The illusory result of this risky advancement is solitary wolves. Simultaneously, the world is confronting outrageous appearances of the alleged “white” psychological warfare and fear-mongering of different beliefs, whose unfortunate casualties are Muslims and vagrants.

9. Forceful patriotism and populism

The change of populism into a main discretionary pattern and the enticement of legislators to just take care of complex issues increment the danger of destroying social clashes, including ethnic and strict ones.

10. Huge scale issues brought about by environmental change

In 2020, differences of significant forces risk totally incapacitating the procedure of battling environmental change, which will make it simpler for different states to seek after a narrow-minded approach, defended by national interests.

Worldwide enthusiasm to the exercises of Astana Club lies in the way that the Kazakhstan talk stage, made in 2015, for a brief time of its work has become a really worldwide stage that unites all the key players of Eurasia. The club permits creating basic methodologies by social affairs at one table gatherings from different geopolitical camps, some of the time in a condition of contention.


Astana Club is a distinctive articulation of the reasonable achievement of Kazakhstan’s multi-vector international strategy.

Over the time of its action, the Club was gone to by in excess of 200 speakers from 40 nations, including the USA, China, Russia, Iran, Germany, Turkey, Incredible England, France, Japan, South Korea, and others.

CIA Experiments On Best Psychics & Remote Viewers, Exposed Online

Despite being allies during the Second World War, the United States and the Soviet Union was anything but friendly with each other after the war ended. There was a sense of competitiveness between the two powers, and they certainly didn’t trust each other.

This animosity sparked several fierce competitions between them. First of all, the ‘Arms Race’ resulted in the development of both atomic and hydrogen bombs. The exploration of space was also a point of contention. The Soviets famously launched Sputnik in 1957 and the US sent the first man to the moon in 1969.


But a lesser-known ‘race’ between the countries involved mind-reading, extrasensory perception (ESP) and psychokinesis. Both countries explored the use of psychic powers in war.

Now that the Cold War has ended, the U.S. government does not officially continue to work with the online psychics or other mediums. However, if they did, it is likely to be highly classified. If you want to check some of the online psychics, make sure you visit backpackerverse.com.

Born During the Cold War: The U.S. Government’s ‘Star Gate’ Project

In 1972, a top-secret intelligence report started circling among U.S. government agencies. This classified report asserted that the Soviet Union was heavily investing in psychic research. Specifically, they were researching psychokinesis and ESP.

After the CIA and military heard about this report, it became clear that the United States needed a similar program. This is how the ‘Star Gate’ project was born.

The Star Gate project was a highly classified government program of scientists, physicists, and psychics. The goal of the program was to determine if there were any practical uses for psychic techniques within the government. This could include any applications like spying on foreign officials, searching for missing persons, and exploring inaccessible territories.

One notable project from the Star Gate program was an experiment involving psychic Joe McMoneagle. He claimed to see what the surface of Mars looked millions of years ago.

Does the CIA use any of the best online psychics or remote viewers still today?


Many of the best online psychics still practice remote viewing in their private lives, but what about in the public sphere? Some swear that the CIA and other government agencies still use psychics to gather intelligence, even today in 2019. According to one source, several remote viewers claim that they were asked to help in the aftermath of the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

However, the U.S. government does not publicly admit to this.

The CIA and Military spent 20+ million dollars on the ‘Star Gate’ program and devoted over 20 years to its study. Surely, that project was not all for nothing. It is not likely though that civilians are privy to this information.

How to Secure an Immigration Bond in the United States

In the United States, citizenship is considered of high significance. When an individual within the country is found neither to be a citizen nor a resident and without a suitable visa, they can be put into custody by a sector of the Department of Homeland Security known as the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

Once captured, they will be judged based on a few factors for risks involved in releasing them. All is not in vain for them, fortunately, since they can be released through posting an amount called the ‘Immigration bond’, through a company like Bob Block Bail Bonds.


As stated, the Immigration bond is an amount posted by an individual deemed as an alien to the United States for them to be set free. Other persons can also post the bond for them provided that they have legal status in the country. Immigration bonds serve as a form of ‘bail’ for the detained individuals similar to a defendant in a court trial.

There are two types of immigration bonds handed by ICE on detained individuals. First is the ‘delivery bond’ which grants freedom provided that they will not miss any of the court hearings. It will enable them to spend time with relatives and consult further actions with their lawyers. On the other hand, the ‘voluntary departure bond’ will grant temporary freedom as long as the individual agrees to leave the country after a certain amount of time.  In both types of bond, the bail amount is forfeited if the detainee fails to observe the rules set by ICE on their bond.

The amount needed to be posted for bail is determined by ICE based on a number of factors. The amount will vary based on the detainee’s immigration status, employment history, criminal records, ties to the United States, and risk of flight. Amounts can range from $1000 to as high as $10000 if the individual has a high risk of flight based on his profile. The bail posted will be returned around a year after completion of all court hearings.


To obtain an immigration bond, the detainee or his relatives must coordinate with ICE to be given a bail amount for temporary release while the case is still ongoing. They must comply with all the needed requirements so that the detainee will be deemed worthy of being given a chance for a bond. It can be paid in two ways. First is through the ‘surety bond’ wherein detainee and his relatives have posted the bail themselves through a cash bond which will be returned to them once the detainee completes all court proceedings, provided that they have enough resources to pay it in full. Such an amount can be paid in cash, check, or US notes. The other approach is through the ‘surety bond’ wherein the detainee’s relatives can seek help from a third party, typically a bondsman, to post bail for them in exchange for a fee of 10-15% of the bail amount.

While being detained due to immigration reasons may seem a scary predicament, the detainee need not despair due to the existence of immigration bonds which will grant him freedom while his case is still ongoing. Through immigration bonds, the detainee can avoid custody and spend his time doing more important things and with the people that matter to him.

Togliattiazot case may ensnare US spies in another major debacle

As the US intelligence community still reeling from a high-profile scandal involving former vice-president Joe Biden and his son, a case of similar magnitude threatens to shake the spy agencies again. A couple of weeks ago a regional court in the Russian city of Samara began hearing the appeal filed by five defendants in a $1.5 billion Togliattiazot fraud case. Togliattiazot, colloquially known as ToAZ, in early July saw his main shareholders Vladimir Makhlai and his son Sergey, who happens to be a US national, along with ex-CEO Evgeny Korolev and their Swiss partners Andreas Zivy and Beat Ruprecht found guilty of a large-scale embezzlement committed by an organized group and sentenced to 8.5-9 years in prison in absentia. They were also ordered to pay the plant itself and its minority shareholders a total of $1.5 billion.


The investigation of the massive offshore profit siphoning scheme perpetrated by Makhlai and Zivy took law enforcement as much as five years to investigate. Judicial inquiry spanned over an additional 1.5 years. Over this period the defense did little to prove their clients innocent, mostly relying on stalling the hearing for as long as possible. It did not have the desired effect and the judgment was rendered anyway.

Now the Makhlais brought the big gu*s to try and reverse the verdict on appeal. A mystery man named Anthony Virgil Raftopol arrived at the Samara court to testify. He may be already known to those who followed the original trial, as a representative for an offshore Cypriot entity named Florenta Management Ltd. The firm is a major shareholder at the JSC Transammiak pipeline through which most of the ToAZ-produced ammonia is exported.

What’s strange is Mr. Raftopol’s track record as well as his reluctance to even state his address more clearly than “a quarter in Dubai”. He also speaks five languages and worked for oil companies of Syria, Lybia and Iraq. The timeline of his stints with the said companies matches perfectly with the outbursts of war in those countries.

So, it’s plain to see Mr. Raftopol is no ordinary citizen. He is most likely a spy tasked with covering up for Sergey Makhlai. The latter’s multiple passports in the name of George Mack and Serge Makligh suggest he is tied to the FBI with some kind of deal. The nature of this relationship clears up if we remember that Mr. Makligh-Mack has long been rumored to make generous donations to a Bahamas-based unofficial “pension fund” set up by FBI retirees. There’s a good reason to believe that at some point in his life in the US Makhlai was recruited by FBI operatives and made a pact with them which boils down to money for protection.


Anyway, while Anthony Raftopol did appear in the Samara regional court on October 18, he didn’t provide any sensational revelation that would have miraculously cleared his friend “Serge” of all charges that one may expect from a rare occurrence of a US intelligence operative appearing in a Russian court. Instead, he stuck to Makhlais’ trademark stalling tactics. First, he tried to raise an objection during the judge’s opening statement to request a copy of court records and later motioned for the same thing again. He was denied both times because he had been given the copy earlier.

It almost looked like Raftopol was not sure what to do but still decided to act even in the face of a risk of getting his cover blown. That may very well be a clear sign of desperation.

Raftopol is not the only one in this story with possible ties to US intelligence. There’s also Michael Spiritus, son of the CIA officer Alan Spiritus, who is CFO at Zivy-owned grain trader Ameropa AG. Why a son a spy would be the right man for managing Swiss company’s finances one can only wonder.

It’s perfectly understandable why the likes of Raftopol and Spiritus are sitting on a volcano right now. Should their dealings with the Makhlais come to light, another major international scandal would be imminent. The law is harsh towards corrupt intelligence officers in Russia and the US alike.

Church Fights Against Title Loans With Political Pressure

Secured short-term loans from private lenders are often the only option for millions of Americans who live paycheck to paycheck. The majority of these Americans have little or no savings and do not have the credit score required by the banks. The private lenders of payday and title loans charge high rates of interest. Many lenders also levy fees initially and subsequently fines when the borrower fails to repay on time.

The Problem with Title Loans

These are usually come with a very limited repayment term. These types of loans typically have a repayment term of thirty days. There is a one-time repayment of the amount with the accrued interest. According to this resource page by Titlelo, title loans also have a similar repayment term but in some cases, the period may be extended to ninety days. A few lenders offer title loans with possible renewal terms of up to a hundred and eighty days.

While such loans are usually around a few hundred dollars, the immediate repayment in a few weeks becomes overwhelming and practically impossible for many borrowers. This leads them to a debt trap. The borrowers have to keep renewing the credit at higher rates of interest while paying the fines for late payment.

img source: http://blog.way2wealth.com

The Initiative for Change and Regulation

There have been innumerable instances around the country where different groups of activists and experts have lobbied for the states and the federal government to legislate on title and payday loans. Now churches have joined the fight against title loans and they are creating political pressure for the legislators to act and protect borrowers from predatory practices of private lenders.

Case in Point

Pastors Carlos at Iglesia Bautista Victoria en Cristo in Fort Worth, Texas, recently helped a woman who had got into default on a payday credit. The woman had borrowed three hundred dollars initially from a money store. The credit was not paid and the accumulated interest inflated the outstanding due. She was compelled to renew the credit and this brought on extra fees and more interest.

The family of the woman also had to take a title loan. They pledged the title of the car and failed to repay it. They were at risk of losing the car and some of their loans would have remained unpaid for their total debt owed to different lenders had skyrocketed to over ten thousand dollars.

The Valencia family managed to help the woman. Fortunately, she did not lose her vehicle. The woman is not alone as there are millions of Americans, most of them earning less than forty thousand dollars a year with little or no savings, who have got into a cycle of debt owing to the easily available title loans that carry enormous interest, additional fees, and possible fines. Many borrowers lose their cars and some even have to sell their homes when the outstanding debt balloons to tens of thousands of dollars.

Lobbying Against Title Loans

Various churches across many states are lobbying the local government and senators to bring in stricter laws to regulate the private lending industry. The availability of small credits at exorbitant interests is making ordinary Americans vulnerable to debt that becomes unmanageable sooner than later. Presently, most states have laws pertaining to these credits. However, some laws are more lax than others. Payday credits have rates of interest as high as 900%. The rates are rarely 300% per year or even close. Most payday credits will have a rate higher than 400% per year in every state where they are legal. Title loans do not have identical rates but they are still as high as 400% with many lenders.

img source: europarl.europa.eu

While many churches are fighting against title loans with political pressure, there are some cases where such bodies are advocating for expansion of the availability of such credits. Some pastors in the state of Florida lobbied and pushed the lawmakers to permit Amscot, a payday loan company, to expand its operations. The company is understood to have been helping many people in need and this group of pastors wants more citizens to have access to easy funds in trying circumstances.

An Inconvenient Conclusion

The premise of title loans has its share of pros and cons. It is true that these present a real risk for borrowers and one may lose their car if they fail to repay. Yet, they are often the only option for borrowers to get some money when they need it the most. Had there been better options or the borrowers would have had impeccable credit histories, any kind of loan with a substantially high or exploitative interest would have been a nonstarter. The states that have extensive laws regulating title and payday loans have loopholes that need to be plugged to prevent lenders from exploiting borrowers that are in need of financial assistance.

1 2 3 4